Just two months after Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput was found dead in his Mumbai apartment, his actress girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty has found herself at the centre of a vicious hate campaign led by some of India’s most high-profile journalists and social media trolls.
Rajput was a rising star in India’s popular Hindi film industry, and his death shocked India. His body was discovered in his bedroom on 14 June. Mumbai police said the 34-year-old appeared to have taken his own life, and reports in the press suggested that the actor had been dealing with mental health issues.
But within days, the attention generated by his death had shifted to Chakraborty. She has become the subject of gossip and innuendo and misogynistic abuse. Every little detail of her life and relationship have been laid bare and debated in public.
Under the post she wrote: “I was called a gold digger, I kept quiet. I was called a murderer, I kept quiet. I was slut shamed, I kept quiet.” She pleaded for help from the cyber crime police.
Though there is no evidence Chakraborty committed a crime, and Rajput’s death is still being investigated, much of the press has already declared the actress guilty, said senior Supreme Court advocate Meenakshi Arora.
“She’s been hanged, drawn and quartered,” Ms Arora said, alluding to a form of grisly punishment handed out in medieval Britain for high treason.
“It’s a complete trial by media. It’s the job of the investigation and the courts, it’s not the job of media to try her. Legally, this is so wrong,” she said.
Payal Chawla, a lawyer, said: “The reporting is terribly terribly troubling. This rabble rousing, this voyeurism, this attempt to satiate public desire for gossip is hugely problematic.
“It also shows how easy it is to hang women out to dry at every opportunity. The issue is not whether she’s guilty or not, what I find problematic is this sort of pre-trial, the mob justice, the vigilantes calling for her arrest.”
According to reports, Chakraborty and Rajput began dating in the summer of last year and moved in together in December. On 8 June, a week before Rajput’s death, Chakraborty went to stay with her parents and wasn’t home when the actor killed himself.
A month after his death, she wrote about her grief in an Instagram post.
“Still struggling to face my emotions… an irreparable numbness in my heart… I will never come to terms with you not being here anymore,” she wrote.
She told journalist Barkha Dutt that Chakraborty had been Rajput’s “strongest support” and said that the actor “depended on her as a mother figure”.
Her statement led many to question whether Walker had broken doctor patient confidentiality. It also put the spotlight on the faults in Indian media’s coverage of sensitive issues like suicide.
“The tragedy of the actor’s death is awful, but look what we have done to the issue of mental health,” said Ms Chawla.
“It’s incorrect to assume that a high-performing individual couldn’t have mental health issues. There are so many examples, such as John Nash and Robin Williams, who were high-performing individuals and had mental health issues.”
Nash, a gifted American mathematician, was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. Williams, an American comedian and actor, took his own life in 2014.
“She’s an accused, but in a way she’s now become a victim,” said Ms Arora. “We don’t know whether she’s guilty or not, but the media trial seriously jeopardises her chances. It will also put extreme pressure upon the judge who has to try this case.”
The coverage had been “reckless”, she said, and “geared towards sensationalism to gain viewership”.
This is not the first time the Indian press has run away with a high-profile case, muddying the waters with its own investigations. The slow pace of Indian judiciary and the nation’s weak libel laws can act a deterrent for those wronged by the press, discouraging them from seeking damages, Ms Arora said. She called on the courts system to issue a gag order in Chakraborty’s case.
“This is obstruction of criminal justice,” she said, “and the press must be asked to refrain from a media trial.”